π§ The One Phrase That Ended a Startup's Six-Month Sales Plateau
Nobody was buying. Marlena Sarunac spent weeks with a client's team before they landed on three words. Then the sales conversations started closing.
.png)
Key Takeaways
- The founding team's internal misalignment is almost always the real positioning problem. When each person on the leadership team describes the product differently, the market receives a different signal from every touchpoint.
- Positioning that needs a tutorial is not positioning. When a product's value requires a whiteboard to explain, the issue is not that buyers are unsophisticated. It is that the team hasn't yet found the language that makes the right buyer recognize the problem as their own.
- Brand debt compounds the same way technical debt does. The cost shows up in stalled sales cycles, ghosted follow-ups, and re-architected go-to-market plans.
In a recent episode of The Way of Product with host Caden Damiano, Marlena Sarunac of The Company Advice walked through a client engagement where a single phrase reversed six months of stalled sales, and what the weeks of work behind that phrase actually looked like.
A technical founding team had been using AI-generated whiteboard images to explain how their product worked. Every feature, every capability, color-coded with arrows. The people in the room who cared about features stayed engaged. The people who were going to write the checks glazed over.
The problem was not the product. The product was real. The problem was that the message was built for the wrong person in the room.
β
The wrong audience was paying attention to the wrong things
Users and engineers cared about how it worked. The buyers who controlled the budget wanted to know one thing: what does this do for me?
Marlena and her team spent weeks with this client before anything was written. Not on a logo. Not on a website refresh. On a single question: what is the actual gap this product fills?
When they finally found the answer, it was three words. A phrase a healthcare buyer could hold in one hand. A phrase that, the moment it landed in a meeting, did not require a whiteboard.
The CEO started noticing that conversations were moving faster. The founder, who had been caught in technical details that buyers were glossing over, could finally move past the question of whether what he had built was a product, a feature, or an idea. It was a company. And it was making sales.
β
The work nobody sees
It is easy to hear a story like that and think the tagline did all the work.
What preceded three words was weeks of heads-down market analysis, workshops with the full team, and a diagnostic that Marlena runs at the start of every engagement: an asynchronous survey where each member of the leadership team writes, separately, what the product does, who the buyer is, and who the user is.
Nine out of ten times, the answers differ.
The founding team doesn't agree on what their company is. That's almost always true and almost never spoken. By the time a team has agreed on the right phrase, they've also agreed on something far more expensive to discover: what they are selling and to whom. The phrase is the visible artifact of that agreement. The agreement is the actual work.
Marlena puts it simply: you can't skip the process of assembling the ingredients before having your cake. A lot of founders want the icing. What they actually need is the eight weeks of prep before it.
β
Brand debt is load-bearing
Founders tend to treat brand and messaging as wallpaper. Something cosmetic. Something you add after the product is built and the sales motion is running.
But brand debt works exactly like technical debt. You can build something genuinely great with no real messaging behind it, and it will catch up with you retroactively. The cost shows up in ghost meetings, unrenewed contracts, and re-architected go-to-market plans. Founders get hung up on the color of the walls of a house that has not been built yet, while the foundation stays unfinished.
The companies that avoid paying double are the ones that do the positioning work early, not as a creative exercise, but as infrastructure.
β
π Catch the full episode here.
β
Frequently asked questions
Why do technical founders struggle to sell to non-technical buyers?
Because they build the message for the person they understand best, which is usually themselves or their engineering team. Technical detail that earns credibility with users creates distance with buyers. The buyer sitting across the table does not want to know how it works. They want to know what problem disappears when they say yes. Getting a technical founder to step back from the whiteboard and answer that question is almost always the first piece of work.
What's the difference between the buyer and the user, and why does it matter for positioning?
The buyer is the person who controls the budget and signs the contract. The user is the person who works inside the product every day. In many early-stage companies, especially in healthcare and enterprise, these are not the same person, and they want different things. Positioning written for the user loses the buyer. Finding the language that speaks to the person who actually decides is often what unlocks a stalled sales cycle.
What's the real cost of skipping positioning early?
It shows up later, and it costs more than it would have. Stalled sales cycles, ghosted follow-ups, and go-to-market plans rebuilt from scratch are all symptoms of positioning debt that was not paid early. The instinct is to defer the work until the product is more mature or the team is bigger. But by then the misalignment is baked into the website, the sales deck, and the market's first impression of you. Undoing it retroactively is always more expensive than doing it right the first time.
Why does a great product sometimes fail to gain traction?
Because traction is not a product problem, it is a clarity problem. A product can be genuinely good and still stall if the buyer cannot quickly understand what it solves, whether it is for them, and why it matters now. The founders who built it know its value intuitively, which is exactly what makes the gap hard to see from the inside. When a buyer has to work to understand you, they do not work harder. They move on.
When is the right time to invest in positioning and brand?
Earlier than most founders think, and before the sales cycle stalls. The instinct is to wait until the product is more built out or the team is bigger. But positioning done retroactively always costs more, because by then the misalignment is baked into the website, the sales deck, the team's language, and the market's first impression. The right time is before those things solidify.




